Classical Archaeology News

Sep 20 2012
“Fat” Gladiators: Modern Misconceptions Regarding the Dietary Practices of Swordsmen of the Ancient Roman Arena

Galen’s reservations about the preponderance of barley “making the flesh soft” suggests that gladiators would not have sought to purposely “pack on the pounds”. Gladiators, like any other fighting men, would not have gained any real advantage from excess bodyfat (and arguably, such extra weight could have actually been a liability).
The condemnation of excess bodyfat can also be seen in the late Roman writer Vegetius’sEpitoma Rei Militaris (Epitome of Military Science). Vegetius wrote specifically about ideal army recruits, but his requirements apply to fighting men in general:
So let the adolescent who is to be selected for martial activity have alert eyes, straight neck, broad chest, muscular shoulders, strong arms, long fingers, let him be small in the stomach, slender in the buttocks, and have calves and feet which are not swollen by surplus fat but firm with hard muscle. When you see these points in a recruit, you need not greatly regret the absence of tall stature. It is more useful that soldiers be strong than big. (emphasis added)
Read more here.

“Fat” Gladiators: Modern Misconceptions Regarding the Dietary Practices of Swordsmen of the Ancient Roman Arena


Galen’s reservations about the preponderance of barley “making the flesh soft” suggests that gladiators would not have sought to purposely “pack on the pounds”. Gladiators, like any other fighting men, would not have gained any real advantage from excess bodyfat (and arguably, such extra weight could have actually been a liability).

The condemnation of excess bodyfat can also be seen in the late Roman writer Vegetius’sEpitoma Rei Militaris (Epitome of Military Science). Vegetius wrote specifically about ideal army recruits, but his requirements apply to fighting men in general:

So let the adolescent who is to be selected for martial activity have alert eyes, straight neck, broad chest, muscular shoulders, strong arms, long fingers, let him be small in the stomach, slender in the buttocks, and have calves and feet which are not swollen by surplus fat but firm with hard muscle. When you see these points in a recruit, you need not greatly regret the absence of tall stature. It is more useful that soldiers be strong than big. (emphasis added)

Read more here.

136 notes

  1. ubiquitousloveliness reblogged this from archaeology
  2. fleshdeep reblogged this from archaeology
  3. diminishingshine reblogged this from archaeology
  4. cerseioftherock reblogged this from joannalannister
  5. thingswoolike reblogged this from archaeology
  6. twiningsandtomatoes reblogged this from love-of-history
  7. littlebluej reblogged this from archaeology
  8. ishmailismyname reblogged this from archaeology
  9. jessastumbles reblogged this from love-of-history
  10. constantxdreamer reblogged this from love-of-history and added:
    Less fat, so that they could fight more and people would be entertainted for a more minutes. I understand the appeal
  11. love-of-history reblogged this from archaeology
  12. heathenrambler reblogged this from archaeology
  13. fralac reblogged this from archaeology
  14. andonipolarbear reblogged this from archaeology
  15. pandizenzero reblogged this from joannalannister
  16. surdico reblogged this from archaeology
  17. inutilium reblogged this from coeurdelhistoire
  18. robcalfee reblogged this from william1in100 and added:
    (via TumbleOn)
Page 1 of 1